We use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.
Cookie settings
Canadian Intellectual Property Law
Common inquiries regarding industrial design patents and trademark protection under Canadian law.
A patent protects the functional or structural aspects of an invention, while an industrial design registration protects the visual features of a manufactured article, such as its shape, configuration, pattern, or ornamentation. Both are separate rights under Canadian law, and an applicant may seek both for the same product if it contains both novel functionality and original ornamentation.
Under the Canadian Industrial Design Act, a registered industrial design is protected for a total term of ten years from the date of registration. The term is divided into a first period of five years and a second period of five years, subject to payment of a maintenance fee before the expiry of the first five-year period.
To be registrable, a trademark must be distinctive, meaning it must actually distinguish the goods or services of one person from those of others. Under Section 12 of the Trademarks Act, a mark that is primarily merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of the character or quality of the goods or services is not registrable unless it has acquired distinctiveness through use in Canada.
No, patent applications and industrial design applications are separate filings under Canadian law. A patent application is filed under the Patent Act, while an industrial design application is filed under the Industrial Design Act. However, both applications can be prepared concurrently to ensure consistent disclosure of the invention and its ornamental features.
The process begins with a trademark search to assess availability and distinctiveness. The application is then filed with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), specifying the goods or services in the Nice Classification. After examination, the mark is published for opposition. If no opposition is filed or successfully overcome, the mark proceeds to registration. The entire process typically takes 18 to 24 months.
Definitions and Interpretive Provisions
An industrial design means the visual features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament, or any combination of these, applied to a finished article. The design must be applied to an article by an industrial process, and the article must be something that can be made and sold separately. Mere functional features or methods of construction are not protected as industrial designs.
Distinctiveness under Section 12 of the Trademarks Act requires that a trademark actually distinguishes the wares or services of its owner from those of others. For engineering product names, the mark must not be clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of the character or quality of the wares or services. A mark that is primarily merely a surname or a geographical name is also not registrable unless it has acquired distinctiveness through use.
A patent for a mechanical invention protects the apparatus, system, or method as defined by the claims. The claims define the metes and bounds of the exclusive right. Protection extends to making, using, or selling the claimed invention in Canada. The specification must enable a person skilled in the art to practice the invention without undue experimentation. The claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the description.
A disclaimer is a statement that the applicant does not claim the exclusive right to a particular unregistrable element of a trademark. Disclaimers are used to overcome objections under Section 12(1)(b) of the Trademarks Act. However, a disclaimer does not affect the scope of protection afforded by the registration. The mark as a whole must still be distinctive. Disclaimers are not permitted for matter that is inherently registrable.
Obviousness is assessed from the perspective of a person skilled in the art, considering the common general knowledge and the prior art. The test involves identifying the inventive concept, the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention, and whether those differences would have been obvious to the skilled person. For mechanical inventions, the analysis often focuses on whether the claimed combination of known elements produces a new and unexpected result.